Procurement Glossary
Scope 3 emissions: Definition, measurement and strategic importance in Procurement
November 19, 2025
Scope 3 emissions include all indirect greenhouse gas emissions along a company's entire value chain that do not fall under Scope 1 and 2. These emissions occur upstream and downstream in the supply chain and often make up the largest share of the corporate carbon footprint. Scope 3 emissions are of central importance for Procurement , as they are significantly influenced by supplier selection and procurement decisions. Find out below how Scope 3 emissions are defined, which measurement methods exist and how you can use them strategically in Procurement .
Key Facts
- Scope 3 emissions comprise 15 categories of upstream and downstream activities in the value chain
- On average, they represent 70-90% of total corporate issues in most sectors
- Purchased goods and services (category 1) are usually the largest source of emissions
- Reporting is becoming mandatory through standards such as the GHG Protocol and increasingly through EU regulation
- Effective reduction requires close cooperation with suppliers and data quality management
Contents
Definition and significance of Scope 3 emissions
Scope 3 emissions refer to all indirect greenhouse gas emissions that arise in the upstream and downstream value chain of a company but are not under its direct control.
Categories and delimitation
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol defines 15 categories for Scope 3 emissions, divided into upstream and downstream activities. Upstream categories include purchased goods and services, capital goods, fuel and energy-related activities and business travel. Downstream categories include transportation and distribution, waste treatment, use and end-of-life treatment of products sold.
Scope 3 vs. scope 1 and 2 emissions
While Scope 1 emissions include direct emissions from own sources and Scope 2 emissions include indirect emissions from purchased energy, Scope 3 emissions cover the entire value chain. They are more complex to measure as they are outside the direct control of the company, but often offer the greatest leverage for reducing emissions.
Importance of Scope 3 emissions in Procurement
Procurement plays a key role in managing Scope 3 emissions as it has a direct influence on supplier selection, product specifications and transportation decisions. Through strategic procurement decisions, companies can address their largest sources of emissions and contribute to the decarbonization of the supply chain.
Measurement, database and calculation
The recording of Scope 3 emissions requires systematic data collection and standardized calculation methods along the entire value chain.
Data acquisition and quality levels
Scope 3 emissions are calculated using primary data from suppliers, secondary industry averages or estimates based on spend data. Primary data offers the highest accuracy, but requires intensive supplier collaboration. Secondary data from databases such as ecoinvent or DEFRA provide quick estimates but are less specific.
Calculation methods and standards
The calculation is based on the GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain Standard, which defines activity-based and expenditure-based approaches. Activity-based methods multiply physical quantities by specific emission factors, while expenditure-based approaches link monetary amounts to sectoral emission intensities. Life Cycle Assessments provide detailed product analysis for critical Categories.
Digital tools and platforms
Modern carbon management platforms automate data collection and calculation through integration with ERP systems and supplier portals. These tools enable continuous monitoring, scenario analyses and the creation of product carbon footprints for strategic procurement decisions.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Interpretation & target values for Scope 3 emissions
The assessment of Scope 3 emissions requires specific key figures and benchmarks for managing reduction measures and measuring progress.
Absolute and intensity-related key figures
Absolute Scope 3 emissions are measured in tons of CO2 equivalent and broken down into the 15 categories. Intensity indicators relate emissions to turnover, production volume or purchasing volume and enable comparisons between companies and time periods. Typical target values are based on science-based targets with reductions of 42% by 2030 compared to the base year.
Supplier-related metrics
The proportion of suppliers with their own emissions targets and the coverage of the purchasing volume by suppliers reporting emissions data are important performance indicators. Leading companies achieve data coverage of over 80% of their purchasing volume and demand binding reduction targets from strategic suppliers. EcoVadis ratings and similar evaluation systems support supplier evaluation.
Category-specific benchmarks
Purchased goods and services (category 1) usually represent 40-80% of scope 3 emissions and require commodity group-specific benchmarks. Transport and logistics emissions are assessed on the basis of emissions per tonne-kilometre, while business travel is standardized by emissions per employee or turnover. Industry-specific comparative values from databases such as CDP Supply Chain enable companies to classify their own performance.
Risks, dependencies and countermeasures
The recording and management of Scope 3 emissions entails various operational, strategic and regulatory risks for purchasing organizations.
Data quality and availability
Incomplete or inaccurate emissions data from suppliers can lead to incorrect calculations and compliance risks. Many suppliers, especially smaller companies, do not yet have adequate data collection systems. Countermeasures include gradual supplier development, training programmes and the implementation of standardized reporting systems with clear data quality requirements.
Regulatory and reputational risks
Insufficient Scope 3 reporting can lead to regulatory sanctions and reputational damage. Compliance requirements are constantly being tightened, while stakeholders are increasingly demanding transparency. Proactive measures include the establishment of robust governance structures and regular external validation of emissions data.
Supply chain dependencies and costs
Dependence on suppliers to provide data can lead to delays and quality problems. Additional costs arise from investments in measurement systems, supplier development and possible price premiums for low-emission alternatives. Risks are minimized through diversification of the supplier base, long-term partnerships and the integration of ESG risk assessments into procurement processes.
.avif)
Practical example
An automotive manufacturer implements systematic Scope 3 management for its Tier 1 suppliers. First, the 200 largest suppliers by purchasing volume, representing 80% of procurement expenditure, are identified. These suppliers receive standardized questionnaires to record their emissions data and reduction targets. At the same time, the company is developing a digital platform for continuous data collection and validation. Suppliers without their own emissions targets receive support through training and best-practice sharing.
- Identification and prioritization of the most emission-intensive suppliers
- Implementation of standardized data collection processes
- Development of joint reduction strategies with key suppliers
Current developments and effects
Scope 3 reporting is evolving from a voluntary initiative to a regulatory requirement with far-reaching implications for procurement strategies.
Regulatory tightening
The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive makes Scope 3 reporting mandatory for large companies. At the same time, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is leading to an increased focus on emissions in the supply chain. These developments are increasing the pressure on purchasing organizations to record precise emissions data and implement reduction strategies.
Technological innovation and AI integration
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing Scope 3 capture through automated data extraction from invoices, predictive emissions models and intelligent supplier assessment. Machine learning algorithms identify emissions hotspots and optimize procurement decisions in real time. Blockchain technology enables transparent traceability of materials and their emissions.
Supplier integration and collaboration
Companies are increasingly developing collaborative approaches to Scope 3 reduction through joint decarbonization programs and science-based targets. Digital platforms enable the exchange of emissions data and best practices between partners along the value chain.
Conclusion
Scope 3 emissions represent the greatest lever for companies to achieve their climate targets and are increasingly becoming a critical success factor in Procurement. The systematic recording, evaluation and management of these emissions requires close cooperation with suppliers and the use of digital technologies. Procurement organizations that establish robust Scope 3 management systems at an early stage secure competitive advantages through improved compliance, risk minimization and innovation opportunities. The integration of emissions criteria into strategic procurement decisions is becoming a core competence of sustainable purchasing organizations.
FAQ
What are the most important Scope 3 categories for Procurement?
The most relevant categories are purchased goods and services (category 1), capital goods (category 2), transportation and distribution (category 4) and business travel (category 6). Category 1 usually accounts for the largest share and offers the highest reduction potential through strategic supplier selection and product specifications.
How can Procurement Scope 3 effectively reduce emissions?
Effective reduction strategies include the integration of emissions criteria in supplier selection processes, the promotion of renewable energies among suppliers, material substitution for lower-emission alternatives and the optimization of transport routes. Long-term partnerships with sustainable suppliers and joint innovation projects increase the impact.
What data quality is required for Scope 3 calculations?
Primary supplier data or industry-specific secondary data is required for regulatory reporting. Data quality should be documented and regularly validated. A step-by-step approach starts with estimates based on spend data and progresses to specific emission factors and supplier data for critical categories.
How do digital tools support Scope 3 management?
Carbon management platforms automate data collection, calculation and reporting through integration with ERP systems and supplier portals. They enable real-time monitoring, scenario analyses and the identification of reduction potentials. AI-based functions support data validation and predictive emissions modeling for strategic decisions.
.png)
.png)
.png)
