Procurement Glossary
Data Quality Score: Key figure for evaluating data quality in Procurement
November 19, 2025
The Data Quality Score is a key metric for quantitatively assessing data quality in purchasing processes. This metric enables companies to systematically measure and monitor the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of their procurement data. Read on to learn how the Data Quality Score is calculated, what trends influence data quality, and how you can avoid risks during implementation.
Key Facts
- Quantifies data quality by percentage assessment of completeness, correctness, and consistency
- Enables continuous monitoring and improvement of master data quality
- Basis for data-driven decisions in strategic purchasing processes
- Supports compliance requirements and risk management in procurement
- An integral part of modern data governance strategies
Contents
Definition and significance of data quality scores
The Data Quality Score is a numerical assessment of data quality that combines various quality dimensions into a single metric.
Core components of the Data Quality Score
The calculation is based on several quality dimensions, which are weighted according to the area of application:
- Completeness: Percentage of mandatory fields filled in data records
- Correctness: Compliance with defined validation rules
- Consistency: uniformity of data formats and structures
- Timeliness: How up-to-date the available information is
Data quality score vs. traditional quality measurement
Unlike manual spot checks, the Data Quality Score enables automated, continuous evaluation of all data records. This transforms data cleansing from a reactive to a proactive measure.
Importance in strategic Procurement
High-quality data forms the basis for accurate spend analytics and informed supplier evaluations. The Data Quality Score acts as an early warning system for data quality issues and supports master data governance in continuous improvement.
Measurement, database and calculation
The systematic recording and calculation of the data quality score requires defined metrics and automated evaluation processes.
Data basis and collection
The evaluation is based on structured data sets from various purchasing systems. Central data sources include supplier master data, material information, and transaction data. A data catalog defines the data fields to be evaluated and their quality criteria.
Calculation methodology
The score is typically calculated as a weighted average of various quality dimensions:
- Completeness rate: (Completed fields / Total fields) × 100
- Accuracy score: (Valid values / Total values) × 100
- Consistency index: Evaluation of format consistency
Automated quality inspection
Modern ETL processes integrate quality checks directly into data processing. Data quality KPIs are continuously updated and visualized in dashboards to enable timely interventions.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Interpretation and target values for data quality scores
Effective use of the Data Quality Score requires clear target values and structured interpretation of the results.
Benchmark values and target setting
Industry-standard data quality scores range between 85-95% for critical master data. Values below 80% indicate a significant need for action, while scores above 95% indicate excellent data quality. The target should be based on the business criticality of the respective data domain.
Segmented quality assessment
A differentiated analysis by data type enables targeted improvement measures:
- Supplier master data: Target value 90-95%
- Material classification: Target value 85-90%
- Transaction data: Target value 95-98%
Trend analysis and monitoring
Continuous monitoring of quality trends identifies systematic problems at an early stage. A standardization level of at least 80% supports comparability between different business areas. Monthly reviews of quality development enable proactive control measures.
Risks, dependencies and countermeasures
The implementation and use of data quality scores entails specific risks that can be minimized by taking appropriate measures.
Misinterpretation of quality values
A high data quality score does not automatically guarantee that the data is suitable for business use. Companies must ensure that the selected quality dimensions are actually relevant to their business. Defining reference data and clear validation rules is essential for meaningful evaluations.
Dependencies on data sources
The quality of the score depends directly on the availability and reliability of the underlying data sources. System failures or interface problems can lead to distorted ratings. A robust data model with redundant data sources minimizes these risks.
Governance and responsibilities
Unclear responsibilities for data quality assurance can lead to inconsistent evaluations. Establishing data steward roles and clear escalation processes ensures consistent quality assessment. Regular audits of master data governance ensure the sustainability of quality measures.
.avif)
Practical example
An automotive supplier implements a data quality score for its 15,000 supplier master data records. The evaluation is based on 25 critical data fields such as address, bank details, and certifications. Initially, the score is 72%, mainly due to incomplete contact details and missing compliance information. Thanks to automated validation rules and a structured follow-up program, the score rises to 89% within six months.
- Identification of the 500 most quality-critical suppliers
- Prioritized adjustment based on purchase volume
- Establishment of monthly quality reviews with purchasing teams
Data and market trends for data quality scores
The development of the Data Quality Score is significantly influenced by technological innovations and changing compliance requirements.
AI-supported quality assessment
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing data quality measurement through automatic anomaly detection and predictive quality assessments. Machine learning algorithms identify patterns in data errors and enable proactive corrective measures. AI methods make duplicate detection significantly more accurate and efficient.
Real-Time Data Quality Monitoring
Companies are increasingly implementing real-time data quality monitoring systems. These systems generate immediate alerts in the event of quality deterioration and enable immediate corrective action. Data quality reports are generated automatically and distributed to relevant stakeholders.
Integration in supply chain analytics
The Data Quality Score is increasingly being integrated into comprehensive supply chain analytics. This development enables a holistic assessment of data quality along the entire value chain and supports strategic decisions based on reliable data.
Conclusion
The Data Quality Score is establishing itself as an indispensable tool for the systematic evaluation and control of data quality in Procurement. Its importance is growing continuously as data-driven decisions increasingly determine business success. Companies that use Data Quality Scores strategically lay the foundation for precise analyses, efficient processes, and well-founded procurement decisions. Continuous development through AI integration and real-time monitoring makes it a central component of modern purchasing organizations.
FAQ
What exactly does the Data Quality Score measure?
The Data Quality Score quantifies the quality of purchasing data based on defined dimensions such as completeness, accuracy, and consistency. It aggregates various quality indicators into a uniform percentage that serves as a control instrument for data quality measures.
How is the data quality score calculated?
The calculation is performed as a weighted average of various quality dimensions. Each data field is checked against defined validation rules and weighted according to its business criticality. The overall rating is calculated from the sum of all weighted individual ratings.
What are the advantages of systematic data quality scoring?
Systematic scoring enables objective quality assessments, continuous monitoring, and targeted improvement measures. It creates transparency regarding data quality issues, supports compliance requirements, and forms the basis for reliable analyses and decisions in Procurement.
What are the risks associated with using data quality scores?
The main risks include misinterpretation of scores without considering the business context, dependence on the quality of the assessment logic, and possible distortions due to incomplete data sources. Careful definition of the assessment criteria and regular validation of the results minimize these risks.
.png)
.png)
.png)
