Procurement Glossary
Duplicate score: Key figure for evaluating data duplicates in Procurement
November 19, 2025
The duplicate score is an important metric for evaluating and quantifying data duplicates in purchasing systems. This metric helps companies measure the quality of their master data and systematically identify redundancies. Read on to find out exactly what the duplicate score is, which methods are used, and how you can use this metric strategically.
Key Facts
- Quantifies the degree of data duplication in purchasing systems
- Enables objective evaluation of master data quality
- Basis for automated cleansing processes and governance measures
- Supports compliance requirements and audit processes
- Reduces operating costs through improved data efficiency
Contents
Definition: Duplicate score
The duplicate score is a numerical rating that measures the degree of similarity between data records and identifies potential duplicates.
Basic components
A duplicate score is based on various comparison algorithms that evaluate similarities in attributes such as supplier names, addresses, or material descriptions. Duplicate detection is performed using statistical and rule-based methods that output a probability value between 0 and 1 or 0 and 100 percent.
Duplicate score vs. data quality score
While the data quality score evaluates the overall quality of data records, the duplicate score focuses exclusively on redundancies. Both metrics complement each other in a comprehensive data quality assessment.
Importance in Procurement
In the procurement context, the duplicate score enables precise identification of redundant supplier, material, or contract data. This supports master data governance and improves the basis for strategic purchasing decisions.
Methods and procedures for duplicate scores
Duplicate scores are calculated using various algorithmic approaches, which vary depending on the data type and use case.
Algorithm-based methods
Modern systems use string matching algorithms such as Levenshtein distance or Jaro-Winkler similarity to evaluate text fields. Phonetic algorithms supplement these methods when analyzing names and designations. The match merge rules define the specific threshold values for different data fields.
Machine learning
Advanced implementations rely on machine learning models that learn from historical cleansing decisions. These systems continuously improve their accuracy and reduce false positives. Integration into ETL processes enables automated quality control.
Threshold management
Defining appropriate thresholds is crucial for the effectiveness of duplicate detection. Values that are too low lead to many false positives, while values that are too high overlook genuine duplicates. Systematic tuning based on data quality KPIs optimizes detection performance.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Important KPIs for duplicate scores
The effectiveness of duplicate score implementations is measured using specific key figures that reflect various aspects of data quality.
recognition accuracy
The precision and recall values measure the accuracy of duplicate detection. Precision indicates the proportion of correctly identified duplicates among all records classified as duplicates. Recall measures the proportion of detected duplicates among all actual duplicates. A balanced ratio of both values is crucial for system effectiveness.
processing speed
The throughput rate measures how many data records can be processed per unit of time. Latency times for individual duplicate score calculations are particularly critical in real-time applications. These metrics help with capacity planning and system optimization.
data cleansing rate
The proportion of successfully cleaned duplicates in relation to identified candidates demonstrates the practical effectiveness of the system. The improvement in the degree of standardization after cleaning activities documents the added value for data quality.
Risks, dependencies and countermeasures
The implementation and use of duplicate checks involves various risks, which can be minimized by taking appropriate measures.
False positive detections
Overly sensitive algorithms can incorrectly classify legitimate data records as duplicates. This leads to unwanted data cleansing and potential loss of information. Regular validation of the recognition rules and implementation of approval workflows significantly reduce this risk.
System dependencies
The quality of duplicate checking depends heavily on the underlying data quality and system architecture. Incomplete or inconsistent reference data impairs recognition performance. Robust data cleansing prior to implementation is therefore essential.
Performance challenges
Complex duplicate score calculations can lead to performance issues when dealing with large amounts of data. Processing millions of data records requires optimized algorithms and sufficient computing capacity. Strategic implementation of indexing and parallel processing effectively addresses these challenges.
.avif)
Practical example
An automotive manufacturer implements a duplicate score for its supplier master data with over 50,000 entries. The system identifies suppliers with similar names, addresses, and tax numbers and rates them with a score from 0 to 100. Suppliers with a score above 85 are flagged for manual review, while scores above 95 are automatically suggested for merging.
- 78% reduction in supplier duplicates within six months
- Improvement in data quality from 72% to 94%
- Savings of 40 hours of manual cleanup work per week
Trends and developments relating to duplicate scores
The further development of duplicate score technologies is significantly influenced by advances in artificial intelligence and changing data requirements.
AI-supported duplicate detection
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing duplicate detection through deep learning models that recognize complex patterns in unstructured data. Natural language processing enables semantic analysis of product descriptions and supplier information. These technologies significantly increase detection accuracy and reduce manual effort.
real-time processing
Modern systems are evolving toward real-time processing of duplicate records during data entry. Stream processing technologies enable immediate evaluation of new data sets. Integration into data lakes supports the processing of large amounts of data with minimal latency.
Industry-specific adaptations
The development of specialized duplicate score models for different procurement categories is gaining importance. Industry-specific algorithms take into account the specifics of material classifications and spend taxonomies. This specialization improves the relevance and accuracy of the results.
Conclusion
The duplicate score Procurement an indispensable metric for modern master data management in Procurement . By systematically evaluating data duplicates, it enables objective quality measurement and supports automated cleansing processes. Continuous development through AI technologies promises further improvements in accuracy and efficiency. Companies that use the duplicate score strategically benefit from higher data quality, reduced costs, and improved decision-making.
FAQ
What is a duplicate score?
A duplicate score is a numerical value that indicates the probability that two data records are duplicates. The score is based on similarity comparisons of various data fields and is typically expressed as a percentage or decimal number between 0 and 1. The higher the value, the more likely it is that the records are duplicates.
How is a duplicate score calculated?
The calculation is performed using comparison algorithms that analyze and weight various data fields. String matching methods evaluate text similarities, while numeric fields are checked for exact matches. The individual evaluations are aggregated according to predefined rules to produce an overall score that reflects the probability of duplication.
What are the advantages of duplicate scores in Procurement?
The duplicate score significantly improves master data quality and reduces operational inefficiencies. The systematic identification of duplicates optimizes procurement processes and minimizes compliance risks. In addition, it enables better spend analysis and supports strategic supplier consolidation through accurate data bases.
What are the implementation challenges?
The main challenges are defining appropriate thresholds and striking a balance between detection accuracy and performance. False positives can lead to unwanted data loss, while overly conservative settings overlook genuine duplicates. Careful calibration and continuous monitoring of system performance are therefore essential for success.
.png)
.png)
.png)
