Procurement Glossary
5 Why: Systematic root cause analysis for effective problem solving
November 19, 2025
The 5 Why method is a proven tool for systematic root cause analysis that identifies the root causes of problems by repeatedly asking "why". In procurement, this technique enables a structured approach to solving complex challenges such as supplier failures, quality deficiencies or cost increases. Find out below what 5 Why is, how the method is applied and what advantages it offers for your procurement management.
Key Facts
- Developed by Sakichi Toyoda as part of the Toyota Production System
- Based on the assumption that five successive "why" questions lead to the root cause
- Easy to use without special tools or complex training
- Prevents superficial symptom treatment by focusing on root cause analysis
- Particularly effective for human errors and process deficits
Contents
What is 5 Why? Definition and purpose in the procurement process
The 5 Why method is a structured problem-solving technique that uncovers the true causes of problems through systematic questioning.
Basic principle and mode of operation
The process is based on the iterative question "Why did this happen?" for each identified cause. This chain of questions overcomes superficial symptoms and identifies deeper system errors. The number five is not fixed - sometimes three questions are enough, sometimes seven are necessary.
5 Why versus other analysis methods
In contrast to more complex tools such as the Ishikawa diagram or FMEA, 5 Why is characterized by its simplicity. While other methods require extensive preparation, 5 Why can be used spontaneously in meetings or for acute problems.
Importance of 5 Why in Procurement
In procurement, the method helps to analyze supplier problems, quality defects and process errors. It supports the development of sustainable solutions instead of short-term repairs and promotes a learning organization through systematic root cause analysis.
Process steps and responsibilities
The successful application of the 5 Why method requires a structured approach and a clear distribution of roles within the team.
Preparation and problem definition
First, the problem is precisely formulated and documented. A multidisciplinary team from Procurement, Quality and the affected specialist departments is put together. The moderator guides the process and ensures that everyone involved understands the problem.
Carrying out the root cause analysis
The team systematically asks the first "why" question about the identified problem. Each answer is scrutinized until the root cause is reached. It is important to stick to the facts and avoid speculation. The lessons learned are continuously documented.
Derivation and implementation of measures
Specific corrective and preventive measures are derived from the root cause identified. Responsibilities and deadlines are defined. The effectiveness of the measures is monitored and validated using suitable quality gates.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Important KPIs for 5 Why
The effectiveness of the 5 Why method can be measured and continuously improved using specific key figures.
Problem-solving efficiency
The average time from problem identification to root cause analysis is an important indicator. The number of problems solved per period is also measured. A reduction in the analysis time while maintaining the same quality shows the growing competence of the team in applying the method.
Sustainability of the solutions
The repetition rate of identical or similar problems after a 5 Why analysis shows the quality of the root cause analysis. Low repeat rates below 10% within six months indicate effective root cause identification. This key figure correlates directly with quality costs and supplier performance.
Team commitment and learning effects
Employee participation in 5 Why meetings and the number of implemented improvement suggestions measure commitment. In addition, the development of analytical skills is assessed by the quality of the questions asked and the depth of the root cause levels reached. These metrics support the continuous development of the problem-solving culture.
Litigation risks and countermeasures at 5 Why
Despite its simplicity, the 5 Why method harbors specific risks that can be minimized through conscious countermeasures.
Superficial analysis and bogus solutions
The greatest risk lies in the premature termination of the analysis for seemingly plausible but superficial causes. Teams tend to stop at the first explanation that seems logical. The countermeasure is the consistent questioning of every answer and the inclusion of different perspectives by interdisciplinary teams.
Subjectivity and bias
The method is susceptible to cognitive distortions and subjective interpretations by those involved. Confirmation bias can lead to only confirming information being taken into account. Structured moderation and the use of objective data from SPC analyses significantly reduce these risks.
Complexity reduction for systemic problems
In the case of complex, multi-causal problems, 5 Why can oversimplify and overlook important interactions. In such cases, the method should be supplemented by more comprehensive analysis tools such as 8D reports in order to fully capture systemic relationships.
.avif)
Practical example
An automotive supplier repeatedly experiences late deliveries of a critical component. The purchasing team applies the 5 Why method: Why late delivery? Production downtime at the supplier. Why production downtime? Machine defect. Why machine defect? Lack of maintenance. Why lack of maintenance? Unclear maintenance responsibility. Why unclear responsibility? Lack of maintenance agreement in the supply contract. The root cause leads to the revision of all supply contracts with clear maintenance clauses.
- Immediate action: Activate replacement supplier
- Medium-term: maintenance agreement with main supplier
- Long-term: standardization of maintenance clauses
Current developments and effects
The 5 Why method is experiencing a renaissance in modern procurement organizations due to digital transformation and new ways of working.
Digitization of root cause analysis
Modern software tools support the systematic documentation and evaluation of 5 Why analyses. Artificial intelligence helps to identify patterns of recurring problem causes and suggests preventative measures. This development enables a data-driven approach to problem solving.
Integration into agile working methods
In agile procurement teams, 5 Why is increasingly being integrated into sprint retrospectives and continuous improvement processes. The method fits perfectly with iterative working methods and promotes an open error culture. Virtual teams use digital whiteboards for collaborative root cause analyses.
Extended fields of application
In addition to classic problem solving, 5 Why is increasingly being used for strategic issues. Supplier development, sustainability analyses and risk assessments benefit from the structured approach. The method also supports the analysis of complex supply chains and global procurement challenges.
Conclusion
The 5 Why method remains an indispensable tool for effective problem solving in procurement. Its strength lies in its ease of application and its focus on root causes rather than treating symptoms. Through systematic application and integration into existing quality processes, it makes a significant contribution to continuous improvement. The combination with digital tools and modern working methods considerably expands its potential for future-oriented procurement organizations.
FAQ
What distinguishes 5 Why from other problem-solving methods?
5 Why is characterized by its simplicity and quick applicability. In contrast to more complex methods such as FMEA or Ishikawa diagrams, it does not require extensive preparation or special tools. The method focuses on a linear cause-and-effect chain and is particularly suitable for clearly definable problems with a dominant root cause.
How many "why" questions are actually necessary?
The number five is a guideline, not a rigid rule. In practice, just three questions can lead to the root cause, while more complex problems require seven or more iterations. It is crucial that the analysis is only completed when a root cause that can be influenced and addressed by specific measures has been identified.
What role does the team composition play at 5 Why?
A multidisciplinary team with different perspectives is crucial for success. Ideally, people directly related to the problem are involved, as well as external moderators for objective guidance. The team size should be between 4-8 people to enable effective discussions without diluting the analysis with too many opinions.
How is the effectiveness of 5 Why analyses measured?
Effectiveness is primarily reflected in sustainable problem solving - measured by low repetition rates of similar problems. Additional indicators are the speed of root cause identification, the quality of the measures derived and the acceptance of the method within the team. Regular reviews of the implemented solutions after 3-6 months validate the long-term success.
.png)
.png)
.png)
