Procurement Glossary
Netting: definition, application and significance in Procurement
November 19, 2025
Netting is an important financial instrument in Procurement that enables the offsetting of receivables and liabilities between business partners. This method reduces transaction costs, minimizes liquidity risks and optimizes working capital management. Find out below what exactly netting means, which methods exist and how you can use them strategically in procurement.
Key Facts
- Netting offsets mutual receivables and liabilities between companies
- Reduces transaction costs by up to 80% for regular business relationships
- Minimizes currency risks through compensation in different currencies
- Improves liquidity planning through lower cash flows
- Requires legal agreements and systematic coordination processes
Contents
Definition: Netting
Netting refers to the systematic offsetting of receivables and liabilities between two or more business partners, whereby only the net amount is transferred.
Basic principles of netting
The netting procedure is based on the offsetting of mutual claims. All outstanding items between the parties are recorded and offset against each other. Only the resulting difference is actually settled, which considerably simplifies payment transactions.
- Bilateral settlement between two partners
- Multilateral offsetting in corporate groups
- Cross-currency compensation possible
Netting vs. traditional payment processing
In contrast to the conventional individual processing of each transaction, netting enables a bundled view. While each invoice is settled separately in traditional procedures, netting combines all items and drastically reduces the number of payment transactions.
Importance of netting in Procurement
In procurement, netting plays a central role in optimizing supplier relationships. Companies with complex supply chains and regular reciprocal transactions in particular benefit from considerable efficiency gains. Integration with Supply Chain Finance further enhances these benefits.
Methods and procedures
The implementation of netting procedures requires structured approaches and clear process definitions for successful implementation.
Bilateral netting procedure
With the bilateral method, receivables and liabilities between two business partners are offset directly against each other. This form is particularly suitable for long-term supplier relationships with regular reciprocal transactions.
- Monthly or quarterly reconciliation of positions
- Automated recording through ERP integration
- Legal netting agreements as a basis
Multilateral netting in group structures
More complex corporate groups use multilateral netting centers that include all Group companies. A central treasury takes over the coordination and handling of all clearing processes. The combination with factoring can create additional liquidity advantages.
Technical implementation and system integration
Modern netting systems integrate seamlessly into existing financial and procurement systems. Automation reduces manual errors and speeds up reconciliation processes considerably. This makes account statement reconciliation much more efficient.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Important KPIs for netting
Measuring the success of netting programs requires specific key figures that take both financial and operational aspects into account.
Efficiency and cost ratios
Netting efficiency measures the ratio between netted and originally planned payments. Typical values are between 60-85% for established programs. Transaction cost savings are determined by comparing the costs before and after netting implementation.
- Netting ratio: Amount netted / total volume
- Cost savings per transaction
- Reduction in the number of payments in percent
Liquidity and working capital metrics
The improvement in the liquidity position is measured by the reduction in tied-up funds. Cash conversion cycle improvements show the effects on working capital management. Integration with accounts payable maturity optimization reinforces these effects.
Risk and compliance indicators
Default rates for netting partners and the number of legal disputes serve as risk indicators. Compliance indicators measure adherence to regulatory requirements and internal guidelines in netting processing.
Risk factors and controls for netting
Despite the advantages, netting entails specific risks that must be minimized by means of suitable control mechanisms and hedging strategies.
Legal and regulatory risks
Incomplete or unclear netting agreements can lead to legal disputes. Insolvency law provisions can impair the effectiveness of netting agreements, particularly in the case of cross-border transactions.
- Examination of legal enforceability in all jurisdictions
- Regular updating of the contracts
- Consideration of insolvency regulations
Operational risks
System failures or data inconsistencies can lead to incorrect allocations. Manual interventions in automated processes significantly increase the risk of errors. Dependence on suppliers' credit limits can create additional complexity.
Liquidity and concentration risks
Excessive concentration on a small number of netting partners can lead to liquidity bottlenecks. Temporal shifts between receivables and liabilities require careful planning. Exchange rate clauses can provide additional protection in international netting agreements.
.avif)
Practical example
An international automotive supplier implements a multilateral netting system for its European locations. The company settles receivables and liabilities between German, French and Italian subsidiaries on a monthly basis. Central processing via the treasury in Frankfurt reduces the number of payment transactions from 450 to 85 per month. Transaction costs are reduced by 75%, while liquidity planning is improved thanks to better predictability of net cash flows.
- Monthly savings: 180,000 euros in transaction costs
- Treasury working time reduced by 60%
- Improvement in liquidity planning by 3 days
Current developments and effects
Digitalization and new technologies are fundamentally changing the netting landscape and opening up innovative application possibilities.
AI-supported netting optimization
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing netting processes through predictive analytics and automated decision-making. Machine learning algorithms analyse transaction patterns and optimize netting cycles in real time.
- Automatic detection of optimal netting times
- Forecasting liquidity requirements
- Risk assessment of netting partners
Blockchain-based netting platforms
Distributed ledger technologies enable transparent and tamper-proof netting processes. Smart contracts automate settlement and reduce disputes between the parties. Integration with dynamic discounting creates new financing options.
Regulatory developments
New compliance requirements and international standards are influencing the design of netting agreements. Particularly in the area of sustainability, there are extended reporting obligations that need to be integrated into the netting processes.
Conclusion
Netting is a powerful tool for optimizing payment processes and working capital management. The systematic offsetting of receivables and liabilities reduces transaction costs, minimizes liquidity risks and improves operational efficiency. However, successful implementation requires careful legal structuring, robust systems and continuous risk monitoring. In the increasingly digitalized procurement landscape, netting is becoming a strategic competitive advantage for companies with complex supplier relationships.
FAQ
What is the difference between netting and normal payment?
With netting, mutual receivables and liabilities are offset so that only the net amount is transferred. With normal payments, each invoice is settled individually, which leads to higher transaction costs and more payment transactions. Netting significantly reduces both effort and costs.
What are the legal requirements for netting?
Netting requires explicit contractual agreements between the parties that regulate the netting modalities. These must be legally enforceable in all relevant jurisdictions. Clauses on insolvency resistance and the treatment of currency risks in international transactions are particularly important.
How is netting efficiency calculated?
The netting efficiency results from the ratio of the netted amount to the total volume of all transactions. An efficiency of 80% means that 80% of the originally planned payments were eliminated through netting. Higher values indicate better netting performance.
What are the risks associated with netting agreements?
The main risks include legal ineffectiveness in the event of insolvency, operational errors due to system failures and concentration risks with a small number of netting partners. Currency risks can create additional complexity in international agreements. Regular review of agreements and diversification of partners minimize these risks.
.png)
.png)
.png)
