Procurement Glossary
Plan/actual comparison of inventory: definition and application in inventory management
November 19, 2025
The planned/actual comparison (stock) is a central control instrument in inventory management that compares planned stock levels with actual quantities on hand. This analysis enables purchasers to identify deviations at an early stage and initiate appropriate corrective measures. Find out below what the planned/actual stock comparison involves, which methods are used and how you can use key figures for control purposes.
Key Facts
- Systematic comparison between planned target stocks and actual stocks
- Enables early detection of over- or understocking
- Basis for scheduling decisions and order releases
- Supports the optimization of storage costs and service level
- An integral part of modern ERP systems and warehouse management
Contents
Definition: Comparison of planned/actual inventory
The planned/actual stock comparison is a systematic comparison of planned and actual stock levels.
Basic components
The comparison comprises several core elements:
- Target stocks based on consumption forecasts and planning data
- Actual stocks from the current inventory management
- Deviation analysis with tolerance ranges
- Identification of causes for differences
Plan/actual comparison vs. inventory
While the physical inventory is a physical stocktaking on a key date, the planned/actual comparison is continuous. It focuses on the deviation between planned and accounting inventories, not on the physical check.
Importance in Procurement
For procurement, the planned/actual comparison forms the basis for needs-based material planning. It enables the timely identification of bottlenecks and excess stock, which optimizes both delivery capability and capital commitment.
Methods and procedures
Various approaches enable a systematic comparison of planned/actual data in inventory management.
Periodic comparative analysis
The regular comparison takes place at defined intervals, typically weekly or monthly. Planned stocks from the stock analysis are compared with current warehouse data. Deviations are categorized and prioritized.
Continuous monitoring
Modern systems enable permanent monitoring through automated alerts in the event of critical deviations. The automatic replenishment system reacts immediately if minimum stock levels are not reached or maximum values are exceeded.
ABC-XYZ-based prioritization
The focus on critical articles is achieved through ABC-XYZ classification. A-items with a high value and X-items with constant consumption receive the highest attention in the deviation analysis.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Key figures for controlling the plan/actual comparison (portfolio)
Specific metrics enable the quantitative evaluation and continuous improvement of the plan/actual comparison.
Deviation rates
The percentage deviation between planned and actual stock levels shows the planning accuracy. Tolerance ranges of ±5-10% are considered acceptable, depending on the ABC classification of the items.
Inventory range analysis
The stock range in days or weeks shows how long current stocks will last with planned consumption. Deviations from target values indicate a need for optimization in planning.
Service level monitoring
The delivery service level measures availability despite stock deviations. Target values of 95-99% depending on Category ensure that planning deviations do not lead to delivery bottlenecks.
Risk factors and controls in the plan/actual comparison (portfolio)
Various factors can impair the informative value and effectiveness of the plan/actual comparison.
Data quality problems
Incomplete or incorrect master data leads to incorrect plan values and distorts the variance analysis. Regular cycle counting procedures and data cleansing are essential for reliable results.
Forecast uncertainties
Volatile markets and unpredictable fluctuations in demand make precise planning difficult. Forecast errors can lead to systematic deviations that need to be cushioned by dynamic safety stocks.
Response times and flexibility
Long replenishment times limit the options for action if deviations are detected. Close coordination with suppliers regarding delivery times and flexibility is therefore critical for success.
.avif)
Practical example
An automotive supplier carries out weekly planned/actual comparisons for critical components. Planned stocks based on production plans are compared with current stock quantities. If there is a deviation of more than 15% for A-items, an urgent order is automatically triggered. At the same time, the team analyzes the causes: Was it forecasting errors, delivery delays or unplanned excess consumption?
- Weekly analysis of all A-items with a focus on critical components
- Automatic alerts if the 15% tolerance is exceeded
- Root cause analysis and adjustment of planning parameters
Current developments and effects
Technological advances and changing market requirements are shaping the further development of the plan/actual comparison.
AI-supported forecast optimization
Artificial intelligence improves the accuracy of planned inventories through machine learning from historical deviation patterns. Algorithms recognize seasonal fluctuations and external influencing factors, making consumption forecasts more precise.
Real-time analytics
Real-time data processing enables immediate reactions to inventory deviations. Inventory health dashboards visualize critical key figures and support fast decision-making.
Integration in Supply Chain 4.0
Networking with suppliers via digital platforms enables transparent inventory information along the entire value chain. Consignment warehouses and vendor-managed inventory reduce planning risks.
Conclusion
The planned/actual inventory comparison forms the backbone of efficient inventory management and enables proactive scheduling decisions. Systematic variance analysis enables buyers to ensure delivery capability and optimize capital commitment. The integration of modern technologies such as AI and real-time analytics significantly increases effectiveness. However, successful implementation requires clear processes, reliable data quality and defined response mechanisms in the event of critical deviations.
FAQ
What is the difference between plan/actual comparison and physical inventory?
The planned/actual comparison is continuous and compares planned and accounting inventories, while the physical inventory is a physical stocktaking on a key date. The planned/actual comparison is used for ongoing control, while the physical inventory is used for balance sheet valuation.
How often should a plan/actual comparison be carried out?
The frequency depends on the criticality of the article. A articles require weekly or even daily comparisons, while C articles are sufficient on a monthly basis. Modern systems enable continuous monitoring with automatic alerts in the event of critical deviations.
What tolerance ranges are acceptable for deviations?
Typical tolerances are ±5-10% for A-items and ±15-20% for C-items. The exact values depend on the industry, predictability of consumption and strategic importance. It is important to define clear escalation levels if these are exceeded.
How can systematic deviations be reduced?
Improvements to forecasting methods, regular parameter adjustments and the integration of external data sources help here. In addition, supplier performance and internal processes should be continuously optimized in order to minimize planning uncertainties.
.png)
.png)
.png)
