Procurement Glossary
Product group structure: Systematic organization for strategic procurement management
November 19, 2025
The product group structure forms the organizational backbone of modern procurement organizations and enables a systematic categorization of all purchased goods and services. It creates transparency across the procurement portfolio and forms the basis for strategic decisions in Procurement. Find out below how a well thought-out product group structure is developed, which methods are used and how it contributes to the optimization of procurement performance.
Key Facts
- Hierarchical organization of the entire procurement portfolio into logical categories
- Basis for strategic category management and supplier management
- Enables bundling of procurement volumes and realization of economies of scale
- Standardizes processes and creates comparability between different Categories
- Supports the development of specific procurement strategies per category
Contents
Definition: Product group structure - meaning and delimitation
A material group structure defines the systematic division of all procured materials, products and services into hierarchically organized categories.
Core elements of the product group structure
The structure comprises several hierarchical levels, from main categories to specific subcategories. Each level follows defined classification criteria such as functionality, technology or supplier market.
- Main product groups (Level 1): Rough categorization according to business areas
- Categories (Level 2): Functional or technical subdivision
- Sub-groups of goods (Level 3): Specific product categories
- Articles/SKUs (Level 4): Individual procurement objects
Product group structure vs. product catalog
While a product catalog is primarily used for ordering, the product group strategy focuses on strategic procurement decisions. It takes into account market dynamics, supplier landscapes and risk profiles of the respective categories.
Importance of the product group structure in Procurement
It enables professional portfolio analysis in Procurement and forms the basis for effective product group management. The structured approach enables procurement managers to identify and implement optimization potential in a targeted manner.
Methods and procedures
The development of an effective product group structure requires systematic analysis methods and structured procedures.
Spend analysis as a starting point
The analysis of expenditure distribution forms the basis for structural development. This involves determining the procurement volume, number of suppliers and transaction frequencies for each category.
- Identification of the highest-volume procurement categories
- Analysis of supplier concentration per Category
- Evaluation of the strategic importance of individual categories
Define classification criteria
Successful structures are based on clear demarcation criteria. These can be functional, technological or market-related and must be applied consistently.
Implementation and governance
The introduction requires clear responsibilities and processes. A product group board controls the strategic direction, while operational teams ensure daily application. Regular reviews ensure that the structure is up to date.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Key figures for managing product group structures
Effective key figures measure the quality and effectiveness of the implemented product group structure and enable continuous optimization.
Structural quality and coverage
These key figures evaluate the completeness and consistency of the categorization. They show how well the structure reflects the entire procurement portfolio.
- Degree of categorization: Share of classified items in the total portfolio
- Depth of structure: Average number of hierarchical levels
- Degree of uniqueness: proportion of uniquely assigned items
Operational efficiency
Process-oriented key figures measure the effects of the structure on procurement efficiency. They show whether the categorization leads to measurable improvements.
Strategic effectiveness
These metrics evaluate the contribution of the product group structure to strategic procurement performance. They include bundling effects, supplier consolidation and the development of category-specific sourcing levers for sustainable cost reduction.
Risks, dependencies and countermeasures
An unsuitable product group structure can entail considerable operational and strategic risks for the procurement organization.
Structural inconsistencies
Unclear boundaries between categories lead to duplicate assignments and inefficient procurement processes. Different departments develop their own structures in parallel, which reduces transparency.
- Implementation of clear classification rules
- Central governance through category management
- Regular structural reviews and adjustments
Lack of market orientation
Internal structures that do not reflect the supplier markets make strategic procurement decisions more difficult. This can lead to suboptimal negotiation results and missed bundling potential.
Technical system dependencies
Complex ERP structures can complicate or delay changes to the product group structure. Reducing complexity in the systems and flexible data models minimize these risks and enable agile adjustments.
.avif)
Practical example
A car manufacturer structures its procurement in four main categories: Production materials, operating materials, capital goods and services. The "production materials" category is further subdivided into raw materials, components and packaging. This systematic organization has enabled the company to bundle its procurement volume by 15% and reduce the number of strategic suppliers by 30%.
- Development of category-specific procurement strategies
- Implementation of standardized evaluation criteria per Category
- Establishment of specialized category management teams
Trends & developments relating to product group structures
Modern technologies and changing market conditions are having a lasting impact on the further development of product group structures.
AI-supported categorization
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing the automatic classification of procurement objects. Machine learning algorithms recognize patterns in product descriptions and automatically assign new items to the appropriate categories.
- Automatic text recognition and categorization
- Continuous improvement through learning algorithms
- Reduction of manual classification efforts
Dynamic structural adjustment
Agile product group structures adapt quickly to market changes. New technologies or business models require flexible categories that can develop dynamically.
Sustainability-oriented structure
ESG criteria are increasingly influencing structural design. Categories are differentiated according to environmental impact, social aspects and governance factors in order to develop sustainable sourcing strategies.
Conclusion
A well thought-out product group structure forms the strategic foundation of successful procurement organizations. It enables systematic category management, creates transparency across the procurement portfolio and supports the realization of economies of scale. Modern approaches integrate AI-supported categorization and take sustainability criteria into account. Success depends on clear classification criteria, consistent governance and regular adaptation to changing market conditions.
FAQ
How many hierarchy levels should a product group structure have?
The optimum number is between 3-5 levels. Too few levels offer insufficient differentiation, while too many levels increase complexity and make practical application more difficult. The structure should be adapted to the size of the company and the complexity of the portfolio.
Which criteria are suitable for categorization?
Proven criteria are functionality, technology, supplier market and strategic importance. The choice depends on the industry and the specific procurement objectives. It is important to apply the selected criteria consistently across all categories.
How often should the product group structure be reviewed?
An annual basic review is recommended, supplemented by ad hoc reviews in the event of major business changes. New product lines, acquisitions or market changes may necessitate structural adjustments. Continuous monitoring prevents structural obsolescence.
What role does IT system integration play?
The product group structure must be mapped consistently in ERP, e-procurement and analysis systems. A uniform data structure enables meaningful analyses and efficient processes. System boundaries should be taken into account when developing the structure in order to avoid implementation problems later on.
.png)
.png)
.png)
