Procurement Glossary
Suitability criteria: Definition, application and significance in Procurement
November 19, 2025
Suitability criteria form the basis for objective and legally compliant supplier selection in procurement processes. They define the minimum requirements that bidders must fulfill in order to participate in a procurement procedure. These criteria ensure that only qualified and reliable suppliers are considered. Find out below what suitability criteria are, how they are applied and what strategic importance they have for Procurement .
Key Facts
- Suitability criteria check the basic ability of bidders to fulfill the contract
- They include professional, economic and technical performance as well as reliability
- The legal basis is the GWB and the procurement regulations (VgV, VOB/A, VOL/A)
- Distinction between mandatory criteria (K.O. criteria) and optional criteria
- Transparent definition and communication are mandatory under public procurement law
Contents
Definition: Suitability criteria - meaning and application
Suitability criteria are objective standards for evaluating the basic suitability of bidders in procurement procedures. They are used to pre-select qualified suppliers before the actual tender evaluation.
Essential components of suitability criteria
Suitability criteria are divided into various categories that enable a comprehensive assessment of the bidder's qualifications:
- Professional performance (references, experience, personnel)
- Economic performance (creditworthiness, turnover, equity)
- Technical capability (equipment, certifications, capacities)
- Reliability (legal compliance, social standards, environmental protection)
Suitability criteria vs. award criteria
While suitability criteria check the basic eligibility to participate, award criteria evaluate the specific contents of the tender. Eligibility criteria are binary (fulfilled/not fulfilled), award criteria allow a gradual evaluation.
Importance of suitability criteria in Procurement
Suitability criteria create legal certainty and transparency in tendering procedures. They reduce the risk of unsuitable suppliers and ensure a fair selection of participants. Clear definitions in the specifications minimize queries and legal disputes.
Methods and procedures
The systematic development and application of suitability criteria requires structured methods and proven procedures to ensure an objective supplier evaluation.
Development of a catalog of requirements
A structured catalog of requirements forms the basis for meaningful suitability criteria. Project-specific minimum requirements are defined and translated into measurable parameters:
- Analysis of performance requirements and risk factors
- Definition of minimum standards per suitability category
- Definition of verification and documentation requirements
Mandatory and optional criteria System
The distinction between mandatory and optional criteria enables a differentiated assessment. Mandatory criteria act as knock-out criteria, while optional criteria evaluate additional qualifications.
Pre-qualification procedure
Pre-qualification allows suitability criteria to be checked before the actual invitation to tender. This reduces the effort involved in the subsequent tender review and creates a qualified group of bidders.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Key figures for controlling suitability criteria
Measurable key figures enable the continuous optimization of suitability criteria and their application in procurement processes.
Qualification rate and number of participants
The number of qualified bidders in relation to the applicants shows the appropriateness of the suitability criteria. If the ratio is too low, this indicates excessive requirements:
- Qualification rate: Qualified bidders / total applicants
- Average number of participants per tender
- Rejection rate by suitability category
Process efficiency key figures
The duration and effort of the suitability test influence the efficiency of the entire procurement process. Optimized criteria reduce the testing effort while maintaining the same quality.
Supplier performance by qualification
The subsequent performance of contracted suppliers validates the effectiveness of the suitability criteria. Systematic performance analyses enable the continuous improvement of qualification standards.
Risks, dependencies and countermeasures
When defining and applying suitability criteria, various risks arise that can be minimized by taking appropriate measures.
Procurement law risks
Unclear or discriminatory suitability criteria can lead to legal disputes and award procedures. Excessive requirements that restrict competition are particularly critical:
- Proportionality test of all criteria
- Transparent communication in tender documents
- Legal review by procurement specialists
Market narrowing due to excessively strict criteria
Overly restrictive eligibility criteria can exclude qualified bidders and reduce competition. This leads to higher prices and less innovation.
Documentation and verification risks
Incomplete or incorrect documentation of the suitability test jeopardizes the legal certainty of the award procedure. A systematic procurement file is essential for the traceability of all decisions.
.avif)
Practical example
An automotive manufacturer defines specific suitability criteria for the procurement of electronic components: At least three years' experience in the automotive industry, ISO/TS 16949 certification, annual turnover of at least 10 million euros and proof of cyber security certification. Out of 15 applicants, eight companies met all the criteria and were invited to submit a bid.
- Clear minimum requirements reduce unsuitable applicants
- Industry-specific certifications ensure quality standards
- Economic stability minimizes delivery risks
Trends & developments around suitability criteria
Digitalization and changing market requirements are shaping the further development of suitability criteria in modern procurement processes.
Digitization of the aptitude test
Electronic platforms and AI-based systems are revolutionizing the assessment of suitability criteria. Automated data reconciliation and digital verification procedures are significantly speeding up qualification checks:
- Automated credit checks and compliance checks
- Digital certificate validation and reference check
- AI-supported risk analysis of supplier profiles
Sustainability and ESG criteria
Environmental, social and governance aspects are becoming increasingly important as suitability criteria. Companies are systematically integrating sustainability standards into their supplier qualification.
Cyber security and data protection
IT security and data protection compliance are becoming critical suitability criteria. Certification in accordance with ISO 27001 or comparable standards is increasingly being defined as a minimum requirement.
Conclusion
Suitability criteria are indispensable tools for professional and legally compliant supplier selection. They create transparency, reduce procurement risks and ensure fair competitive conditions. Continuous adaptation to changing market requirements and legal framework conditions is essential. Through systematic application and regular review, suitability criteria contribute significantly to the success of strategic procurement processes.
FAQ
What is the difference between suitability and award criteria?
Suitability criteria check the basic ability to fulfill the contract and can be evaluated in binary form (fulfilled/not fulfilled). Award criteria, on the other hand, evaluate the specific contents of the bid gradually and serve to determine the most economical bid.
How are suitability criteria formulated in a legally compliant manner?
Suitability criteria must be proportionate, transparent and non-discriminatory. They should be objectively measurable, contract-related and clearly defined in the tender documents. A legal review by procurement specialists is recommended.
Can suitability criteria be changed during the procedure?
In principle, changes to the suitability criteria after publication of the invitation to tender are not permitted, as this would violate the principle of equal treatment. Corrections are only possible under strict conditions in the event of serious errors.
What evidence can be requested for suitability criteria?
Permissible evidence includes references, certificates, balance sheets, creditworthiness information and self-declarations. The required evidence must be proportionate and suitable for assessing the respective suitability category.
.png)
.png)
.png)
