Procurement Glossary
Catalogue Compliance: Key figure for catalog usage in Procurement
November 19, 2025
Catalogue Compliance measures the proportion of orders that are processed via approved catalogs. This key figure shows how consistently companies use their strategic purchasing agreements and avoid maverick buying. A high level of catalog compliance leads to better cost control, simplified processes and stronger supplier loyalty.
Key Facts
- Measures the percentage share of catalog-based orders in the total order volume
- Typical target values are between 80-95% depending on the industry and product category
- Direct impact on purchasing costs, process efficiency and compliance
- Requires continuous monitoring and active control measures
- Key performance indicator for evaluating the implementation of the purchasing strategy
Contents
Definition and meaning of catalog compliance
Catalogue compliance refers to the systematic measurement and control of catalog usage in the procurement process.
Basics of catalog compliance
The key figure records the ratio between catalog-based and non-catalog-based orders. It includes electronic catalogs as well as approved supplier lists and framework agreements.
- Quantification of strategic purchasing implementation
- Identification of deviations and maverick buying
- Basis for process optimization and cost reduction
Catalogue compliance vs. other compliance key figures
In contrast to general contract compliance, catalog compliance focuses specifically on the use of predefined procurement channels. While the catalog quota measures similar aspects, catalog compliance also takes into account qualitative factors such as the completeness and timeliness of catalog data.
Importance of catalog compliance in Procurement
A high level of catalogue compliance strengthens the negotiating position with suppliers and enables better conditions through bundled volumes. It reduces administrative costs and increases transparency regarding expenditure and supplier relationships.
Measurement and calculation for catalog compliance
The calculation is based on a systematic analysis of all order transactions and their allocation to approved catalogs.
Calculation formula and data basis
Catalogue Compliance = (catalog-based orders / total orders) × 100 The measurement can be based on both volume and transactions.
- Recording of all order transactions over defined time periods
- Categorization by catalog and non-catalog orders
- Consideration of exceptions and approved deviations
Segmentation and detailed analysis
The analysis is typically carried out by product category, cost center and supplier. This enables targeted improvement measures in critical areas. The ABC analysis helps to prioritize optimization activities.
Automated measuring systems
Modern procurement systems enable the automated recording and evaluation of catalog compliance. Integration with ERP systems ensures complete data capture and real-time monitoring of the order rate per catalog.
Tacto Intelligence
Combines deep procurement knowledge with the most powerful AI agents for strong Procurement.
Interpretation and target values
The evaluation of catalogue compliance requires industry-specific benchmarks and differentiated target values for each product category.
Industry-specific benchmarks
Typical target values vary between 70-95% depending on the industry and the maturity of the procurement organization. Manufacturing companies often achieve higher values than service providers due to more standardized requirements.
- Production and manufacturing: 85-95%
- IT and telecommunications: 75-90%
- Healthcare and pharmaceuticals: 70-85%
Correlation with other key purchasing figures
High catalog compliance correlates positively with improved adherence to delivery dates and reduced PO cycle time. At the same time, the level of service increases thanks to standardized procurement processes.
Dynamic target value adjustment
Target values should be reviewed regularly and adapted to changing market conditions. New product categories or suppliers may require temporarily lower compliance expectations until full catalog integration.
Measurement risks and bias in catalog compliance
Measuring catalogue compliance involves various methodological risks and potential biases that need to be taken into account.
Data quality and completeness
Incomplete or incorrect data capture can lead to incorrect compliance values. Unrecorded orders outside the standard systems and manual processes are particularly critical.
- Shadow IT and decentralized procurement systems
- Incomplete integration of supplier catalogs
- Time delays when updating data
Misinterpretation and gaming effects
Focusing solely on high compliance values can lead to suboptimal decisions. Employees could choose unsuitable catalog products just to improve the key figure. The error rate for invoices can increase due to forced catalog use.
Category-specific distortions
Different product categories have different catalog suitability. Standard products naturally show higher compliance rates than specialized or project-specific procurements. This can lead to distorted overall assessments and requires differentiated target values per category.
.avif)
Practical example
A medium-sized mechanical engineering company found that only 65% of orders were processed via approved catalogs. Through systematic analysis, the purchasing team identified that many direct orders were being placed, particularly in maintenance and repair. After implementing a specialized MRO catalog and training employees, catalogue compliance increased to 87% within six months. This led to 12% cost savings and 30% shorter order cycles.
- Systematic weak point analysis by cost center
- Targeted catalog expansion in critical areas
- Continuous change management and employee training
Current developments and effects
Digitalization and AI technologies are revolutionizing the measurement and management of catalogue compliance in modern Procurement.
AI-supported compliance monitoring
Artificial intelligence enables the automatic detection of compliance deviations and proactive control measures. Machine learning algorithms identify patterns in ordering behaviour and suggest optimizations.
- Predictive analytics for compliance risks
- Automated notifications in the event of deviations
- Intelligent catalog recommendations for users
Integration into digital procurement platforms
Cloud-based procurement solutions integrate catalog compliance seamlessly into the ordering process. Real-time dashboards and mobile applications increase transparency and user-friendliness. The touchless rate increases through improved catalog integration.
Sustainability and ESG compliance
Modern catalogs are increasingly integrating sustainability criteria and ESG assessments. Catalogue compliance is becoming an instrument for implementing sustainability goals and regulatory requirements in Procurement.
Conclusion
Catalogue compliance is a key performance indicator for strategic Procurement and cost control. Its systematic measurement and optimization leads to measurable improvements in efficiency, costs and supplier relationships. Modern AI technologies open up new possibilities for automated monitoring and proactive control. However, successful implementation requires a holistic view of technology, processes and employee behavior.
FAQ
What is the difference between catalog compliance and catalog quota?
Catalogue compliance measures the actual use of approved catalogs, while the catalog ratio indicates the proportion of catalog-compatible products in the overall product range. Catalogue compliance is behavior-oriented, catalog quota is structure-oriented.
How often should Catalogue Compliance be measured?
Monthly measurement enables timely control measures, while detailed quarterly analyses are sufficient for strategic decisions. Critical product categories may require weekly monitoring.
What factors have a negative impact on catalog compliance?
The main factors are incomplete catalogs, complicated ordering processes, lack of employee training and failure to enforce compliance rules. Outdated or unattractive catalog prices also lead to avoidance behavior.
How can catalogue compliance be sustainably improved?
Successful improvement requires a combination of technical measures (better catalogs, simpler systems), organizational changes (clear processes, responsibilities) and cultural aspects (training, incentives).
.png)
.png)
.png)
