A Kanban system is a pull-based control method for material flow and production in which the actual consumption of goods triggers replenishment. Developed at Toyota in the 1940s, it replaces classic push planning with a self-regulating logic: every withdrawal process automatically generates a reorder impulse that prompts suppliers or internal production stages to replenish.
Core components are:
Taiichi Ohno developed Kanban in response to the inefficiencies of mass production. While Western manufacturers focused on large batch sizes, Toyota prioritized the reduction of muda (waste):
One breakthrough was the decoupling of production stages using Kanban cards - instead of centralized planning, each stage controls its own output based on the consumption of the downstream stage.
In the push system, scheduling is based on forecast requirements, which leads to excess stock when demand drops. Kanban inverts this logic:
Kanban push system (pull)
Control pulse Forecast consumption
Stock level High (buffer) Low
Flexibility Low High
Throughput times Long Short
Studies show that Kanban increases inventory turnover by 30-50% while at the same time reducing the risk of shortages by 60%.
Successful implementation requires the specification of:
1. batch sizes: At 200 pieces/day and 3 days delivery time plus 1 day buffer: 200 × (3+1) = 800 pieces
2. signal types:
3. digital Kanban solutions: Modern systems replace physical cards with:
A global supplier implemented a two-stage Kanban for 5,000 C-parts (screws, seals):
Results after 12 months:
Traditional Kanban systems reach their limits with high variant diversity. E-Kanban solutions address these through:
One example is the KanbanBOX platform, which:
A McKinsey study shows that digital Kanban implementations achieve the following effects:
Siemens is a pioneer in electronics manufacturing:
Kanban systems are not a panacea, but they are an indispensable tool for purchasing managers who:
Concrete steps for implementation:
As the example of the automotive supplier shows, savings of 20-30% in procurement costs are realistic - provided that the system is understood as a strategic management tool and not as an operational quick-fix solution. In times of volatile markets, Kanban thus becomes a survival strategy for manufacturing companies.