A random sample inspection is a statistical procedure for quality control in which only a defined part of a quantity of goods is inspected according to specified criteria. For the purchasing department, this enables efficient quality assurance while minimizing the time and cost of incoming goods inspections.
Example: For a delivery of 10,000 screws, 200 pieces are randomly selected and tested according to the AQL standard (Acceptable Quality Level), whereby the entire delivery is accepted if there are a maximum of 3 defective parts in the random sample.
Sampling is an inspection method in which only part of a total quantity is inspected in order to draw conclusions about the whole. In procurement, this means that not all delivered products or documents are fully inspected, but the quality inspection of the entire delivery is assessed on the basis of selected samples. This method makes it possible to work more efficiently and conserve resources without significantly compromising the reliability of the inspection.
In the procurement process, random sample testing is an important tool for quality assurance agreements and risk minimization. By carrying out targeted spot checks, buyers can ensure that suppliers comply with the agreed quality standards without having to check each item individually. This saves time and money and helps to make supply chain resilience more efficient.
In many companies, random sample testing forms the backbone of quality assurance. Based on statistical methods, it makes it possible to draw conclusions about the overall quality of a batch from the inspection of just a few units. In practice, however, companies are faced with the challenge of converting traditional manual processes into modern, efficient quality inspection in order to meet the increasing demands for speed and precision.
Traditional approach: In traditional sampling, employees are trained to perform manual inspections based on set criteria. Sample selection is often random and inspectors use physical checklists to document errors and defects. This process is time-consuming and prone to human error. In addition, the data is often not recorded digitally, which makes subsequent analysis and tracking difficult.
Statistical Process Control (SPC): Modern quality control relies on automated systems and statistical process control. Data is continuously collected by integrating sensors and measuring devices directly into the production control system. This data flows in real time into software solutions that use algorithms to detect deviations from the target status. This enables companies to react proactively to quality problems before faulty products even arise. The use of SPC makes it possible to increase process capability and simultaneously cut costs by reducing rework and rejects.
A medium-sized automotive supplier implemented Statistical Process Control in its production of precision components. By using intelligent measuring systems, the error rate was reduced by 30%. The response time to quality deviations was reduced from an average of 8 hours to almost real time. In addition, the manual inspection effort was reduced by 50%, which led to an increase in efficiency and lower process costs. process costscosts of 200,000 euros per year.
ConclusionSample testing is an indispensable tool in modern quality management. It enables efficient quality control with simultaneous cost optimization. The success of this method depends largely on the correct statistical implementation and careful definition of the test parameters. With the advent of digital technologies and AI-supported systems, random sample testing is becoming even more precise and reliable, further minimizing quality risks. The balance between inspection effort and quality assurance remains crucial.